Friday, February 26, 2016

Parshas Ki Sisa - Parsha Stumpers

~ Something to Think About ~

פרשת כי תשא


Parsha Stumpers

By: Daniel Listhaus

  1. (30:12) Why must B'nei Yisroel be only counted indirectly by using an object?
  2. (30:13) When the Torah uses an expression of “zeh” (“this”), it means Hashem showed something to Moshe. What was so complicated about the shekel that Moshe needed a prop to visualize it?
  3. (30:18) Why is the kiyur listed in this week's parsha and not in Terumah or Tetzaveh  with the other keilim in the mishkan?
  4. (30:19) Why was it necessary for the Kohanim to be mekadeish their feet with the kiyur?
  5. (31:3-4) Once the Torah already tells us that Betzalel had ruach Elokim, why was it necessary that he have wisdom, understanding, and knowledge? Furthermore, Rashi explains that “da'as” (knowledge) refers to ruach hakodesh. What is the difference between ruach Elokim, which is mentioned explicitly in the passuk, and ruach hakodesh which is hinted to in “da'as”?
  6. (31:18) The passuk and Rashi tell us that Moshe learned the Torah from Hashem Himself, and yet right after he he finished he needed to review it. How could this be? If Hashem, surely the best teacher, was teaching Moshe, certainly the best student, why would it be necessary to already start review immediately after completing?
  7. (32:13) Rashi brings from the gemara Berachos that after Hashem threatened to wipe out klal yisroel and restart with Moshe's family alone, that Moshe argued back that “If a chair with three legs cannot stand, then certainly a chair with one leg cannot stand...” The three legs Moshe was referring to were: Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov...
1.    Moshe came from them as well obviously so whatever zechusim they had to offer would not cease if Hashem would continue B'nei Yisroel with Moshe's family alone. So what was Moshe's argument?
2.    Even if Moshe was arguing that their zechusim would be no longer, still from the fact that Hashem was offering must be that the key qualities in Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov were all in Moshe as well. So what was Moshe's response of being a one-legged chair? That may be true, but perhaps he was a three-in-one with a massive leg just as able to hold up the table.

  1. (32:15) Why is it important that The Torah tells us here about this specific attribute of the luchos?
  2. (32:18) Moshe says to Yehoshua that he does not hear the sound of shouting of might nor the sound of shouting of weakness, rather a distressing sound. The word “a'nos” used to say “distressing” is also part of the first two expressions “kol a'nos gevurah” and “kol a'nos chalusha”. Why did Moshe not just simply say “kol gevurah” and “kol chalusha”?
  3. (32:19) When Moshe threw down the luchos, Rashi describes that Moshe thought to himself, if for transgressing on karbon pesach where it says that you can't feed it to a stranger, and that is only one commandment, so certainly the whole torah I cannot give to klal yisroel who are now “strangers” for having sinned with the cheit ha'eigel! What was this kal v'chomer exactly?
  4. (32:34) Rashi tells us that in every bad thing that comes to the world there contains an element of the cheit ha'eigel in it. Why is this 'fair' that we are punished for something done at Har Sinai? Hashem says he does not punish children for their fathers, providing they do not follow in his bad ways?
  5. (33:4, 33:6) The passuk at first says that  each man did not put on his crown, and then one passuk later says that Hashem told Moshe to tell klal yisroel to take off their crowns. Which crowns were being referred to? And how could we resolve this contradiction?
  6. (33:11) Rashi, all the way at the end explains in the passuk that Hashem said to Moshe, “ I am angry at Yisroel and you are angry at Yisroel, who will draw them near to repent....?” Why not answer simply: No one. If they were both furious with klal yisroel, who cares what will ultimately happen to them?
  7. (34:6) Why is Hashem's rachamim (mercy) necessary before a person sins?
  8. (34:27) Why are we forbidden to write down Torah she'ba'al peh? And why do we in fact have it written down?
  9. Where is there a hint in this week's parsha as to what to do if one is lost in the desert                and does not know which day is shabbos?

Friday, February 19, 2016

Parshas Tetzaveh - Parsha Stumpers

~ Something to Think About ~
פרשת תצוה

Parsha Stumpers

By: Daniel Listhaus

  1. The Rosh and Ba'al Ha'Turim along with others point out that this is the only parsha which does not contain Moshe's rabbeinu name (since his birth in parshas shemos). Why is this? And why was this parsha chosen to be the one to leave out Moshe's name (especially considering the fact that the reason Moshe's name was erased has to do with an episode in next week's parsha)?

  1. The passuk tells us (28:12) that the avnei shoham were placed on the shoulder straps so that Hashem would remember the B'nei Yisroel as a zechus for us. Why does Hashem need us to remind Him of the greatness of the shevatim ?

  1. Rashi (29:24) tells us that the “wavings” were to hold back the harmful winds and the harmful dews. What does waving back and forth, up and down have anything to do with chasing away harmful winds and dews?

  1. If the Urim V'tumim had incredible powers to let the Kohen Gadol know answers to difficult questions, then why couldn't Shlomo Ha'Melech ask it where he could find the shamir instead of capturing and asking Ashmedai (King of Sheidim)?
1.    Depending on how you answered, how do you understand how Eili the Kohen Gadol could have used it to find out whether Channah (shmuel han'avi's mother) was drunk or not?

2.    What is wrong about asking the Urim V'tumim questions that you could obtain from another source?

  1. What was the purpose of the bigdei kehuna?


  1. How could there be a mitzva to wipe out Amalek and yet a mitzva to remember them?

Friday, February 12, 2016

Parshas Terumah - Parsha Stumpers

~ Something to Think About ~
פרשת תרומה

Parsha Stumpers

By: Daniel Listhaus

  1. What were the three ways which the B'nei Yisroel could participate in to help build the aron?

  1. The Gemara tells us that Betzalel was the one who had to correct Moshe and tell him to build the mishkan first before its keilim (vessels). Didn't Moshe already know this from Hashem? And even if not, why didn't he think to build the mishkan first anyway?

  1. Why is it that the dimensions of the aron are all incomplete measures?

  1. (Shemos 25:10) Hashem commanded that the poles of the aron never leave it. Why?

  1. The aron was made of three arons : gold, wood, and gold. How do we know that it is from three arons together and not just a wooden one with gold on inside and outside? Also, what is the significance of being made with three arons as opposed to one?

  1. Rashi (25:21) sites a machlokes as to whether the luchos were placed into the aron before the lid had been placed on it to complete it, or after it had been put on was it then removed to insert the luchos and then put back on. What is the significance of this machlokes?

  1. The Gemara (Menachos 29a) tells us that Hashem had to show Moshe three things which he just could not understand until he saw them: Rosh Chodesh, the Menorah, and sheratzim. How could it be that Moshe was not able to understand Hashem's clear explanation that he should need visual props to help him understand?

  1. Why was the Shulchan taught before the Menorah? The Menorah represents ruchniyus whereas the Shulchan represents gashmiyus. Shouldn't the Menorah be listed first?

  1. The first Ba'al Ha'Turim in this week's parsha says that Hashem told Moshe that when speaking to B'nei Yisroel to donate for the mishkan, that he should do so in a nice, soft, appeasing voice. Why more so here than any other time?

  1. Why is it that when talmidim used to say a good s'vara, the rebbe would exclaim “kaftor v'pherach!” ?


  1. Why were hammers used for the mishkan, but disallowed for beis hamikdash?

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Parshas Mishpatim - Parsha Stumpers

~ Something to Think About ~

פרשת משפטים


Parsha Stumpers

By: Daniel Listhaus

  1. The Ba'al Ha’turim sees a remez (hint) in the parsha to the fact that a Jewish judge must first try to create a compromise between two fighting parties before judging the case. Why is this true though? Shouldn't we focus on getting the correct judgment rather than settling on a compromise which is definitely not the truth?

  1. The Jewish slave who decides to stay by his master must get his ear peirced. The mechilta (34) comments that this is because he became a slave by not listening to the commandment at Har Sinai not to steal. Why then should the ear be pierced more here than by one who does any other aveirah?

  1. Rashi writes that even if non-Jews judge regarding certain matters as Beis Din, still one should not go to them to judge even in such a case. Why is this? Why would this be considered giving chashivus to avodah zarah if it is well known that the Torah's perspective is the same as society's perspective in this area?

  1. Why does the Torah interrupt between the passukim of hitting and cursing one's parents with “וגנב איש ומכרו...מות יומת?

  1. The passuk in Perek 22 Passuk 17 says, “מכשפה לא תחיה. Sorcery is against the Torah and is taken seriously.
                   a. What is fundamentally wrong with sorcery?
                   b. Why is the mitzva worded as “The sorcerer you should not let live”.                             Instead of: “Don't practice sorcery” or “If you practice sorcery, you                           will be put to death”, or at least. “One who does sorcery, you should                              kill”?
                   c. I am not sure if this would fall under “כשוף" , but what is the origin of                Avada Kedavra [והמבין יבין ]?

  1. Rashi (22:24) says that every word אם in the Torah implies a voluntary act – except for in three places. What are these three places? And is there a connection between them?

  1. Rashi (23:7) writes that one could not accept a bribe even to judge correctly. What is this case? Is someone offering a bribe to judge correctly? Is a bribe being offered to judge one way which the judge feels is correct? Either way, why not take the bribe? It shouldn't even be considered a bribe in such a case but more like an incentive to judge correctly?


  1. Which mitzva in this week's parsha was neglected by the Jews during the time of ירמיה הנביא?